Fundamental Labs
Tracking
$BTC+1.39%$78,591.00$SOL+0.87%$86.85$HYPE+2.62%$42.43$MSTR-0.84%$171.02$BTC+1.39%$78,591.00$SOL+0.87%$86.85$HYPE+2.62%$42.43$MSTR-0.84%$171.02

The street's best takes on crypto — without the timeline.

A curated feed of what serious analysts are saying about specific tokens, equities, and private companies. Updated continuously.

Trending

  1. $HYPE12
  2. $SOL3
  3. $CARDS3
  4. $AAVE3
  5. $JUP2

Valuation

2 takes

All takes are our summaries. Tap View on Xfor the analyst's original words.

adcv_@adcv_·1d

What should DeFi rates really be? Probably not 12%

Adcv_ argues Tom Dunleavy's 12.55% DeFi lending yield overstates risk through double-counting independent risk premia that are already captured in expected loss, and using the wrong risk-free anchor. Using SOFR at 3.6% instead of the 10Y Treasury, the correct decomposition yields 3.95% for prime DeFi (Steakhouse USDC benchmark) and 7.1% for high-yield DeFi, implying Dunleavy's figure prices in a 7% expected loss rather than accurately reflecting current DeFi risk.

ValuationDeFi
Read article →
Tom Dunleavy@dunleavy89·3d

What should DeFi Rates really be?

Tom argues the $292M KelpDAO exploit and subsequent $13B TVL drain exposed severe DeFi mispricing: deposits earning 5% on major protocols like Aave accept BB-rated pricing for technically worse-than-CCC risk. Using TradFi credit frameworks, DeFi's 1.5-2.0% forward probability of default with 90% loss given default requires a fair yield floor of 12.55-13%, not 5.5%, because exploits cascade in minutes rather than quarters and composability failures create unauditable contagion that deposits absorb without protocol failure.

ValuationDeFi
Read article →