Fundamental Labs
Tracking
$BTC+1.39%$78,591.00$SOL+0.87%$86.85$HYPE+2.62%$42.43$MSTR-0.84%$171.02$BTC+1.39%$78,591.00$SOL+0.87%$86.85$HYPE+2.62%$42.43$MSTR-0.84%$171.02

The street's best takes on crypto — without the timeline.

A curated feed of what serious analysts are saying about specific tokens, equities, and private companies. Updated continuously.

Trending

  1. $HYPE12
  2. $SOL3
  3. $CARDS3
  4. $AAVE3
  5. $JUP2

Latest takes

8 takes

All takes are our summaries. Tap View on Xfor the analyst's original words.

adcv_@adcv_·1d

What should DeFi rates really be? Probably not 12%

Adcv_ argues Tom Dunleavy's 12.55% DeFi lending yield overstates risk through double-counting independent risk premia that are already captured in expected loss, and using the wrong risk-free anchor. Using SOFR at 3.6% instead of the 10Y Treasury, the correct decomposition yields 3.95% for prime DeFi (Steakhouse USDC benchmark) and 7.1% for high-yield DeFi, implying Dunleavy's figure prices in a 7% expected loss rather than accurately reflecting current DeFi risk.

ValuationDeFi
Read article →
Tom Dunleavy@dunleavy89·3d

What should DeFi Rates really be?

Tom argues the $292M KelpDAO exploit and subsequent $13B TVL drain exposed severe DeFi mispricing: deposits earning 5% on major protocols like Aave accept BB-rated pricing for technically worse-than-CCC risk. Using TradFi credit frameworks, DeFi's 1.5-2.0% forward probability of default with 90% loss given default requires a fair yield floor of 12.55-13%, not 5.5%, because exploits cascade in minutes rather than quarters and composability failures create unauditable contagion that deposits absorb without protocol failure.

ValuationDeFi
Read article →
Tom Wan
Tom Wan@tomwanhh·4d

Can Morpho/JupLend overtake Aave/Kamino? A history of DeFi lending on Ethereum and Solana

Historical pattern analysis of DeFi lending on Ethereum (Compound → Aave → Morpho) vs Solana (Solend → Kamino → JupLend). The one phase transition we can directly compare (Phase 1 → Phase 2) played out ~25% faster on Solana. Implication: the challenger moves are real, and Solana's compression suggests JupLend takes share from Kamino faster than Morpho takes from Aave.

$AAVE$JUPFundamentalDeFi
Read article →
Carlos
Carlos@0xcarlosg·4d

Aave: Cracks in the Monolithic Thesis

On April 18, 2026, attackers minted 116.5K unbacked rsETH via a compromised LayerZero bridge and borrowed ~$193M from Aave V3. Carlos argues this exposes a structural weakness in Aave's monolithic pool architecture — any bad asset contaminates the whole pool. Complements Pratik Kala's tranching proposal; both are pointing at the same fundamental issue, from different angles.

$AAVEFundamentalDeFi
Read article →
Mesh
Mesh@MeshClans·6d

Tokenization of RWA yields onchain might be the biggest opportunity that no one has noticed

The $140T global fixed-income market is moving onchain, and every major RWA issuer — Apollo ($938B AUM), BlackRock, Paxos, Strategy — converges on Pendle's PT/YT as the venue making institutional yields retail-accessible. Examples: Apollo ACRED 8.77%, Strategy STRC 11.50%, Paxos USDG 4.5%, Ethena USDe 8.5%. RWA on-chain hit $23.6B in March 2026 (+66% YTD); Pendle has settled $69.8B lifetime. Thesis: TradFi doesn't realize it needs this onchain bond market yet, and Pendle sits at the center.

$PENDLEFundamentalDeFi
Read article →
Donovan
Donovan@donovanchoy·9d

The 2026 Bull Case for JUP

Jupiter generated $184M of 2025 revenue, but JUP was suppressed by 159% supply growth (1.35B → 3.5B) from airdrops + 641M/yr team vesting. February's 'Net-Zero Emission' DAO vote postponed Jupuary indefinitely, removing 33.8% 2026 dilution. Donovan's SOTP (aggregator + perps + JupLend) values JUP at 28% base / 59% bull upside — before crediting JupNet optionality or zero-CAC neobank distribution into 43M onchain wallets. Risks: superapp execution complexity, crypto cyclicality, and the DAO's ability to vote emissions back.

$JUPPitchDeFi
Read article →
Tindorr
Tindorr@0xTindorr·13d

STRC: The Biggest Catalyst We Have for DeFi Revival

DeFi yields are in survival mode — Aave stables 2%, Ethena/Sky under 4%, Pendle PTs can't clear 6%. STRC (Strategy's perpetual preferred, 11.5% monthly dividend, backed by 767K+ BTC) breaks the ceiling. Three protocols bring it onchain: Apyx Finance ($121M supply; apxUSD/apyUSD), Saturn Credit ($44.6M TVL in under a month; USDat/sUSDat), Buck ($2.2M). Flywheel: deposits → protocols buy STRC → Strategy issues shares → buys BTC → attention flows back to DeFi. This is the catalyst that brings liquidity back onchain.

$MSTR$STRC$BTCPitchDeFi
Read article →
Emperor Osmo
Emperor Osmo@Flowslikeosmo·15d

Pendle is DeFi's only Monopoly. It's Trading at 85% off. The Market is Wrong

PENDLE at $1.07, 85.8% off ATH, $177M mcap. 2025: $44.6M fees (+134% YoY), $5.7B avg TVL, $54B monthly volume. Monthly revenue collapsed from $4.44M (Aug 25) to $552K (Mar 26), -87.6% — but this is yield compression (sUSDe, not competitive displacement — all direct competitors Element, APWine, Sense, Tempus are gone). The sPENDLE upgrade redirects 80% of revenue to buybacks (+$17M/yr net vs $3.9M emissions, 4.4x coverage). Fair value: $3–$6 bear/base, $8–$12 bull contingent on Boros scaling + yield recovery. One of DeFi's clearest recovery plays at a historic trough.

$PENDLEValuationDeFi
Read article →